Diesel fumes cause lung cancer, the World Health Organization declared Tuesday, and experts said they were more carcinogenic than secondhand cigarette smoke.
The W.H.O. decision, the first to elevate diesel to the “known
carcinogen” level, may eventually affect some American workers who are
heavily exposed to exhaust. It is particularly relevant to poor
countries, where trucks, generators, and farm and factory machinery
routinely belch clouds of sooty smoke and fill the air with sulfurous
particulates.
The United States and other wealthy nations have less of a problem
because they require modern diesel engines to burn much cleaner than
they did even a decade ago. Most industries, like mining, already have
limits on the amount of diesel fumes to which workers may be exposed.
The medical director of the American Cancer Society praised the ruling
by the W.H.O.’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, saying his
group “has for a long time had concerns about diesel.”
The cancer society is likely to come to the same conclusion the next
time its scientific committee meets, said the director, Dr. Otis W.
Brawley.
“I don’t think it’s bad to have a diesel car,” Dr. Brawley added. “I
don’t think it’s good to breathe its exhaust. I’m not concerned about
people who walk past a diesel vehicle, I’m a little concerned about
people like toll collectors, and I’m very concerned about people like
miners, who work where exhaust is concentrated.”
Debra T. Silverman, a cancer researcher for the United States government
who headed an influential study published in March that led to
Tuesday’s decision, said she was “totally in support” of the W.H.O.
ruling and expected that the government would soon follow suit in
declaring diesel exhaust a carcinogen.
Three separate federal agencies already classify diesel exhaust as a
“likely carcinogen,” a “potential occupational carcinogen” or
“reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.”
Dr. Silverman, chief of environmental epidemiology for the National Cancer Institute, said her study
of 50 years of exposure to diesel fumes by 12,000 miners showed that
nonsmoking miners who were heavily exposed to diesel fumes for years had
seven times the normal lung cancer risk of nonsmokers.
The W.H.O. decision was announced Tuesday in Lyon, France, after a
weeklong scientific meeting. It also said diesel exhaust was a possible
cause of bladder cancer. Diesel exhaust now shares the W.H.O.’s Group 1 carcinogen status with smoking, asbestos, ultraviolet radiation, alcohol and other elements that pose cancer risks.
Dr. Silverman said her research indicated that occupational diesel
exposure was a far greater lung cancer risk than passive cigarette
smoking, but a much smaller risk than smoking two packs a day. For
years, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, and the National Toxicology Program of
the National Institutes of Health have rated diesel as a potential, not
proven, carcinogen.
The Diesel Technology Forum, which represents car and truck companies
and others that make diesel engines, reacted cautiously to the W.H.O.
ruling, noting that modern diesel engines used in the United States and
other wealthy countries burn low sulfur fuel, so new trucks and buses
emit 98 percent less particulates than old ones did and 99 percent less
nitrogen oxide, which adds to ozone buildup.
Allen Schaeffer, the forum’s executive director, said the studies
considered by the W.H.O. “gave more weight to studies of exposure from
technology from the 1950s, when there was no regulation.”
Ultra-low-sulfur fuel was introduced in 2000 and became mandatory in
2006, he said, and about a quarter of the American truck fleet was built
after that mandate was passed. The government estimates that the entire
truck fleet is replaced every 12 to 15 years, he added.
Many studies have suggested links between diesel and lung cancer, but
Dr. Silverman said hers was the first to measure with precision how much
diesel exhaust each group of mineworkers was exposed to. Her study
clearly established that the more a miner was exposed to diesel, the
greater his cancer risk, she said.
“Now we need to focus on managing exposures to diesel exhaust,” Dr. Brawley said.
No comments:
Post a Comment